Whether trial by jury should be abolished in the English.
This essay will be discussing the jury system and whether it should be abolished from the English Legal System. The jury system is viewed as one of the most fundamental parts of the English Legal System, however in practice it is only in a minority of cases.
Should juries be abolished in the UK? From conception in the Magna Carta 1215, juries have become a sacred constitutional right in the UK’s justice system, with the independence of the jury from the judge established in the R v. Bushel’s case 1670. Although viewed by some as a bothersome and an.
Essay Sample Jury selection is laid down in the Juries Act 1994. While it is proven that there are reasonable alternatives to a jury trial and that there is no doubt that jury trial is both time consuming and expensive when compared with trial by magistrates or by a judge alone, however the right to a jury trial shall not be dismissed so lightly.
Should the jury system be abolished? A jury is a sworn body of people convened to deliver an impartial verdict. A jury is a sworn body of people convened to deliver an impartial verdict. Juries are composed of jurors, who are by definition layman finders of fact, not professionals.
It should be abolished for all criminal trials’. Trial by jury has been regarded as a paradigm of English criminal law, described as a bulwark against oppression, a safeguard of our liberties since the common sense of the ordinary person prevails when all else fails.
As demonstrated in the Michael Brown and Eric Garner cases, today’s state criminal grand juries serve no useful purpose and make a mockery of justice; they should be abolished. There is nothing.
The jurors vary rarely know much about the legal procedure and are therefore not case-hardened as Judges would be should they be introduced, as in alternative suggestions to the jury system. Fourthly, the public of England and abroad have great confidence that the cases have been tried fairly and that the system is effective.
People are always biased in some ways including those people. That way the judgement may be very unfair since opinions from the juries are considered to it. Because of bribes and every problems in the society, isn't it so true that that juries shouldn't be in the court? Therefore, I strongly believe that juries should be abolished in criminal.
By this law, trials could be conducted without a jury when there is a real and present danger of jury tampering or where jury tampering has taken place. As a result of this new regulation, the first serious offence to be held without jury in England for more than 350 years took place in 2009 (11.BBC).
The key to doing well in an essay combining both juries and magistrates is to make sure you do examples for both. For a question on advantages, for example, you must do two advantages of magistrates and two of juries to score full marks. Task: Complete the following exam question following the rules mentioned above.
The absence of such a legislation in the country aimed at abolishing the jury system is a great testament to the fact that the system is serving the justice system in the country in the best way possible and also it continues to have tremendous public trust something that makes it all important not to abolish it since this has the propensity of injuring the justice system.
American jury system could be very helpful, as well as cause damage because of making wrong decisions in serious cases. Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on Is the America Jury System still a Good Idea?
Even questioning whether a jury can find facts for which there is no evidence could be read in a number of ways. Perhaps the Pryce jury was seeking a strong affirmation of the basics of the trial process because one of its number was asserting improper justifications for his or her conclusions.
